Posts

Showing posts with the label a level religious studies

A Level Religious Studies: WTF is the Verification Principle? Revision Notes

WTF is the Verification Principle? The Verification Principle was intended as a tool to allow us to distinguish between the meaningful statements of science and the meaningless claims of pseudo-science and mysticism, and in that sense it has at times been valuable: as Ayer argued, sometimes people assume that because a word exists, there must be a corresponding real thing to which it refers. But the principle was quickly discredited as an adequate criterion of meaning, and much recent philosophy has examined less narrow ways in which language is used. But it is difficult to abandon completely the notion that for a statement to be meaningful, it must in some sense be shown to correspond to reality. Flew argues that for a statement to be meaningful it must at least be open to falsification– there must be some way of showing it to be false. A statement that fits any imaginable state of affairs doesn’t appear to say anything at all, and is therefore meaningless. Religious statements te...

A Level Religious Studies: Mahayana Buddism Revision Notes

Image
Mahayana Buddhism So Far The Council Why? – Maha Kashyapa concern for the future of the dharma after the Buddha died.   1 st Council – Maha Kashyapa and many senior monks held a council of 500 arahats to collect the teachings of the Buddha. After asking upali (chief disciple of the Buddha) the vinaya was agreed (monastic discipline). They also questioned Ananda (attendant of the Buddha) on sermons taught by the Buddha – the sutta was established (teachings). Why ? To settle an agreement between a group of monks and the elders of the order. 2 nd Council – Over monastic practise – some monks had a lax interpretation of vinaya. They wanted greater freedom in the application of rules of the vinaya. The practises of dissenting monks were unacceptable but they refused to accept the decision of the council known as Mahasanghilias – they were sympathetic to ordinary monks. This led to Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism. The only goal worthy of attainment was Buddhahood. Why ? To remove the ...

A Level Religious Studies - Intuitionism by G. E. Moore revision notes

G. E. Moore Intuitionism argues that morality is objective and cognitive. Intuitionists argue that we just know what goodness is. G. E. Moore simply states that the word 'good' cannot be defined. He likened it to the colour yellow - we know what yellow is, but we can't define it. He said quite simply: "Good is good, and that is the end of the matter." Moore said that we work out right and wrong by looking at the impact consequences have upon an action. If the consequence is right (Moore argues you'll simply know if it is right), then it becomes good. Good comes from consequence, not reason. This presents Moore's version of intuitionism as teleological. Moore criticised other ethical theorists of creating a naturalistic fallacy when they try and define good. By naturalistic fallacy, Moore means that we shouldn't define 'good' by certain properties that we like or desire. If something makes us feel happy, Moore said that we can't therefore de...

Popular posts from this blog

A Level Business Studies - Responding to a fall in industry capacity utilisation

A Level Geography - TNCs and Globalisation Essay

A Level Business Studies - Leadership Style